Played on Saturday and Sunday although been a pretty rainy few days.
On Saturday played a single game 1-1 with Iw; T100-2 played better for single compare to LMOS. Then played doubles got bageled lost with Bd vs Ww-Iw with LMOS.
On Sunday played 2 tight games with LMOS: 5-6 Iw vs Bd-Ww then 4-6 Du vs Bd-Iw.
The LMOS is good for overhead and volley but pretty low net clearance. Maybe time to restring the T100-2.
Played on Friday and Sunday.
Friday with TR96-2 and CX16: 6-7 CX16 (Dd vs Fh-Ch), 7-2 TR96 (Dd vs Fh-Ch), and 7-3 TR96-2 (Fh vs Dd-Ad). Played on outdoor court at night. TR96 gives out more power whereas some double faults from using CX16.
Sunday with LMOS and TR96-2: 6-2 LMOS (En vs Rm-Dv), 6-5 LMOS (Ny vs Dn-Mk) and then singles 4-1 TR96-2 vs Kn.
LMOS is so nice at net, power and forgiveness to attack with low net clearance on forehand and backhand to attack.
Pic: gt, dn, ar, me, iw, dv, rm, en, dd, mk, ed, rh
Played on Saturday and Sunday and all with Head LM OS.
Played twice on Saturday 6-3 (Gt vs Ww-Op) and 6-3 (Ht vs Ww-Ny). Hitting out with Pak Ade and the control was good.
Played twice on Sunday 5-5 from 4-1 (En vs Rm-Dv) an easy going game, 6-3 (De vs Ny-Ed).
The LMOS was good out flat serve and forehand, and soft volleys and overhead. The power is slightly lower than T100, need to push to generate spin and power. Below is the review from 2003 TW website.
For our playtest we strung the Liquidmetal Radical OS with a 17 gauge multifilament string at 61lbs and added an overgrip. String vibration dampeners were provided and use was left up to the individual preference of the playtester.
Offering a larger hitting area and a bit more pop, the Liquidmetal Radical OS is slightly more forgiving in play than the Liquidmetal Radical MidPlus and should appeal to a larger spectrum of player levels. First to comment on groundstrokes was Chris. He said "I found plenty of power on my groundstrokes with the Liquidmetal Radical OS. I enjoyed hitting slice backhands which became effortless when I caught the ball well out in front. However, I felt the Liquidmetal Radical OS had more to offer on the forehand side, where I enjoyed some nice topspin cross court angles. If I had a two handed backhand I might have enjoyed hitting groundstrokes much more, but I just didn't feel like I was reaping the benefits of the Oversize head shape with my one handed drive. I just wasn't getting the same amount of topspin on my backhand as I was generating with the Liquidmetal Radical MP. As with most Oversize racquets, I found I had the cunning ability to launch the occasional groundstroke for no apparent reason. This was no surprise to me, as I usually find myself lacking some control when hitting with an Oversize racquet. To counter, I normally string the racquet right at the maximum recommended tension. With the test racquet strung at only 62lbs, I did not have a chance to see if an increase in tension would result in an increase in control and confidence. Although the stringbed does not have what I would call a true hot spot, it is definitely livelier than the Midplus. I also noticed a more forgiving feel on off-center shots and found the Liquidmetal Radical OS to be extremely comfortable. It is one of the better Oversize racquets I've hit with in some time."
Granville also found the Liquidmetal Radical OS to be very comfortable. He said, "I had great confidence when using this racquet and I was able to really trust my strokes. I found a slight boost in power and comfort compared to hitting with the Liquidmetal Radical MP. Whether hitting forehands or backhands, I was able to put the ball deep in either corner or hit short side to side to really 'work' my opponent."
Mark said, "the Liquidmetal Radical OS comes very close to being a great racquet. Like the Liquidmetal Radical MP, the Liquidmetal Radical OS has an excellent blend of power, control and maneuverability. The power level is a little higher with the OS, but it's still low enough to provide good control from the baseline. The extra power helped me hit wide balls with more authority, and it made my slices more effective. I was able to hit solid forehands and backhands without taking a huge swing, and I was able to place the ball with confidence. The one factor that keeps me from putting the Liquidmetal Radical OS into the "great racquet" category was my inability to generate a lot of spin." Combined Score 72
If the Liquidmetal Radical OS impressed our playtesters from the baseline, it really started to shine at the net. "Once again the new Radical offers good comfort with a soft and lively stringbed," said Granville. "As with any Oversize racquet, if you are off center a bit you will feel that ever so slight wobble, but this can be minimized by dropping the tension a pound or two. The racquet has some added punch due to the slight increase in mass - but it is a noticeable improvement, especially on the high forehand volley where you can really punch it for the put-a-way. On the drop shot, I found a very delicate touch with little to no adjustment from my usual racquet."
Chris said he "really enjoyed volleying with Liquidmetal Radical OS. I found much more control on the volley than I had on groundstrokes. The maneuverability and weight of the Liquidmetal Radical OS seemed perfect for volleying, with a nice blend of stability, comfort, power and control. I was able to just direct the ball to my intended target when my opponent supplied the pace, but I also had good results hitting slower balls when I needed to punch the volley. When hitting low volleys and half-volleys I appreciated the larger sweetspot offered by the Oversize head shape."
Mark said, "The Liquidmetal Radical OS is very effective at the net. It was versatile enough to let me put the ball away or keep it in play, depending on the situation. I find a lot of oversize racquets have too much power at the net. This makes it tough to hit low volleys. With the Liquidmetal Radical OS I was able to keep the low balls in play and put away the high balls. Plus, the maneuverability was excellent and the sweetspot large. Combined Score 85
Our team soon settled into a good rhythm on the serve with the Liquidmetal Radical OS. Chris said "the extra power that I struggled to control from the baseline worked in my favor on the serve. I found my first serve had a little extra zip when I flattened it out on the down the 'T' serve. Spin serves got plenty of bite from the stringbed and I hit some nice kick and slice serves to open up the court. I also found the Liquidmetal Radical OS to be very solid when hitting overheads. I managed to get enough power and accuracy to put all but the most difficult to reach overheads away, and I found the racquet really responded to a good wrist snap."
As with the Liquidmetal Radical MP, Mark found the OS a good serving racquet with the exception of generating spin. "I served very consistently with the Liquidmetal Radical OS, with an occasional exceptional serve thrown in," said Mark. "The control was excellent and the power adequate. It was also very easy on my arm. The one serve I had problems with was the kick serve. I couldn't generate enough spin to get the high bounce needed to make a kick serve effective. I was able to place the serves well, but my opponent was able to return them too easily because they would just sit up and wait to be hit."
Granville said, "the Liquidmetal Radical OS is a very sweet racquet to play with and serving with the racquet is just anther example of this. I noticed the added 1/2 ounce more in the OS version (from the i.Radical OS) when serving. That little extra mass definitely delivers a bit more pop on the serve as compared to previous Radicals. The racquet even feels more solid at impact while maintaining its flexibility. On overheads this was a racquet where the more I played with it the more confident I became. The overhead is a good example of the playability of the racquet. On a simple offensive overhead I can put the ball away with little thought. In a more defensive position I have the control and soft feel to take a little off the ball and roll a softer cross court placement, giving me a shot at turning defense into offense. At the 11-ounce mark for weight it gives you a few more options than a heavier racquet might." Combined Score 77
Remembering that this is the racquet of choice for one of the greatest returners in the game, our playtesters had high expectations for the Liquidmetal Radical OS. Chris was first up, saying, "as on the groundstrokes, I would have liked to have hit returns with a Liquidmetal Radical OS strung up near the maximum recommended tension range. I felt like the ball was flying on me a bit on the return. I think the Liquidmetal Radical OS is more than capable of handling higher tensions without sacrificing comfort or feel as it really is an arm friendly racquet. Even with the test racquet strung lower than my ideal tension I was able to hit some nice chip returns and be consistent with drive returns if I took a little pace off. The racquet also felt quite maneuverable. I felt I could have added some weight to the frame and still been able to get the racquet around on the return."
Granville found he could hit out with confidence on the return, saying "when returning with the Radical I was able to swing out and play offensive tennis right from the get go. While I'm sure Agassi could return serve the way he does with a 2x4, it comes as no surprise that this is his racquet of choice. It must be perfectly suited for his game." Mark said the Liquidmetal Radical OS "was well suited for returning serves. The oversize head provides a large sweetspot and the moderate power level allows for a full swing with good control. It's also very maneuverable and stable. However, I did have some returns sail on me because they didn't have enough spin." Combined Score 73
The Liquidmetal Radical OS is a comfortable racquet that excelled at the net and turned in a solid performance everywhere else. Our playtesters found a good blend of power, stability and control on most shots, but there where times when playtesters struggled to generate the spin they were seeking. When serving with the Liquidmetal Radical OS our team found control as well as power. Again, comfort was a noticeable quality of the racquet when serving. In our opinion, this latest version of the ever evolving Radical has a lot to offer and is every bit as worthy of continuing the Radical name as previous versions. Combined Score 78
Played on Monday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday.
Monday played with MT loss 2 sets 3-6 (tf), 2-6 (fj) with TR960.
Strung TR960-3 with Artengo hybrid at 40 lbs, and T100-2 with wilson spin 17g at 40 lbs.
Friday 7-1 (hn vs fh-hr) TR960-2, 3-3 (dd vs fh-hr) both TR960-3 too stiff, less power.
Saturday 3-6 (dn vs bd-nh) and 3-6 (bd vs dn-nh) both with T100-3, T100-2 too stiff, less power.
Sunday 6-5 AG3 (dn vs hr-bd), good power from existing layup with 2 grams at 3-9 and leather grip and old tcfbr string.
Monday again with MT 0-6 (al vs fr-ad), 6-4 (ff vs ad-mn), 6-4 (fr vs rv-al), 4-3 (ad vs fr-al). T100-3 too uncontrolled, TR960-3 with hybrid for better control. Finally a racquet for high level playing.
TR96-3 added 0.5 grams to 12 position for more power.
Went to KM tribute by SBM on friday. Stories from Adil, Heru P, Shanti P, Erry, Yoga.
Stories were:
AM: exit strategy, boat, walk to lembang, observant
Heru: integrity, value, backup, humanity
Shanti: Trust
Erry: knowledge, brotherhood
Yoga: mentor
Other: easy person to talk
Then, talked to Supramu and he said about his integrity of not wanting position etc.
Racquet of the year 2023 with category:
- best game performance: T100 (power and control)
- most comfortable and performance: TR960 (control and comfort)
- best new: AI 98 (control and comfort)
Game play: 2-6 TR96 (Op vs Ww-Bd), 6-4 TR96 (Dn vs Iw-Hr), 2-6 T100-2(Dn vs Iw-Bd), 0-8 TR96 (Dn vs Ww-Mr)
My dad always had tennis racquet around. I never saw him play (maybe once) when I was in early elementary. His tennis racquet were Wilson Pro Staffs, hammer, mostly Wilson. He bought me and my brother Donnay when we were junior. My brother played tennis better when we were little, he was stronger because older. I played tennis in high school with one of his racquet, Pro Staff Ultra 95 tapered beam. Beside tennis, he also played soccer, a goalkeeper. When I was in junior high, saw him played as striker and scored a very good goal, faking and rounding a goalkeeper. His soccer shoes were copa mundial size 7.5 which I used in 9th and 10th grade before they got stolen. I remember when I asked for the copa, he said not the la plata shoes. The la plata shoes were there but in a bad condition with soles about to break to pieces. I should have save the laplata shoes.
[tbc]
Played once with MT on Monday. Played a single and two doubles sets. Single super-tiebreak: 10-7 vs Bntg with TR96. Doubles: 6-5 T100 (Bntg vs Fjr-X) and 4-6 TR96 (X vs Fjr-Jet). All players are of upper intermediate level.
Then hitting out with Y player with TR96. The TR96 performed well but slightly low heft and underpower however the comfort was good, no arm pain.
Played on Friday and Sunday.
On Friday played 2 sets. First set 6-0 (Dd vs Ar-Ah) with CX18, one of the opponent was a beginner. Second set 6-7 (Ar vs Dd-Hn) trailing with CX18 the switch to TR96-3 to tied at 6-6, we made a lot of UE.
On Sunday played 4 sets: 4-6 (Mk vs Hm-Rh) with TR96-3 we were playing for fun, 6-3 (Iw vs En-Bd) with T100-3 a hard fought battle after opponent adjusting to our game, 5-6 (Rh vs Ny-Mk) T100-3 another fun game tied after a hard game, 5-5 (Dn vs Iw-Ny) T100-3 where we trailed 0-4 before changing our strategy (from Dn upfront to me upfront because the opponents like to lob us or aiming weak volley).
Racquet review: CX18 a nice racquet (harder than TR96), TR96 (harder than T100), T100 (fit outdoor court)
Pic 1: me, Iw, En, Bd
Pic 2: En, Rh, Hm, Mk, Bd, me, Iw
Played doubles games in Friday and Sunday and practice with family on Sunday afternoon.
On Friday brought two of TR96s, the L3 felt better for control. Lost both games 3-7 (Ar vs Fh-Ad) and 4-7 (Fh vs Dd-Ad).
On Sunday played 4 times with T100-3 except for first set: 6-3 (Bd vs Hr-Rh), 6-0 (Ny vs Dn-Bd), 6-3 (Ww vs Iw-Dd) and 3-6 (Ny vs Bd-Dd).
The highlight was with Ww vs Iw-Dd, a strong opponent.
Then practice with family.
Also, bought Zildjian low-volume cymbals.
Played 3 times.
Friday played 3 sets all with TR96-L2 7-3, 7-4, 5-7 (Fh vs Dd-Ad). The TR96-L2 played well, easier compare to L3 due to lower static weight (I changed the L3 to follow this setup).
Sunday morning, played one set only 6-3 with T100 (Hr vs Dd-Rmt). On paper we were stronger but opponent can be better.
Sunday night practice with families, brought sorts of racquet but for low ball practice uses T100L which has easy swing speed.
Sold my ATS 98, it has a high swing weight and am fit better with TR96.
Played two times this weekend, friday and sunday. Friday all with TR960 7-2, 7-3 (Fh vs Hn-Dd), and 4-7 (Dd vs Fh-Hn). On Sunday 6-2 T100 (Gt vs Dd-Op) and 4-6 TR96 (Iw vs Dd-Ny). Iw borrowed mine T100 and am stuck with TR96 which is harder to play on rough outdoor especially against moonballer due to low power.
TR96 with new lead set up produces low but heavy spin balls (maybe).
As info, a friend borrowed the T100 and afterward the strings are still straight meaning that probably he did not produced a lot of spin, compare to me which always straighten them after several hits.
Played once this week on Sunday. Played 2 sets: 6-2 (Opa vs MS-Budi) with T100 and 2-6 (Don vs Iwn-Wwn) with TR96 and T100. The second set opponent were stronger than us though we had a change.
The current TR96 set up are lead 2g at 12, 2g at 3&9, leather grip. The frame felt powerful, less spin, but less control. The set up now added 1g to 3&9 for total of 3g. Swing felt better but need to try it.
Bought a head liquidmetal OS, shall see how it compare with IG youtek version. There is something special with this OS with such thin beam.
So, I used to have this one, I thought it was a crash but then read https://black.net.nz/avedis/NAK.html and realised I had 16" k custom.
No wonder, I had trouble crashing with it which I thought was too heavy for a crash but too unstable for a ride.
I also had the same K custom in 20 inch which has strong hammering technique.
Played on Saturday for tough 3 sets all with T100-1 and T100-2. 1st set 6-4 (Rml vs Ad-Rsy), 2nd set 5-6 (Iwn vs Mur-Rsy) and then last set 6-4 (Kk vs Hrm-End).
Overall, T100 has good control and power.
Pic: me, endr, murt, kk, iwn, hrm, rml, msm, miko, ad, rsy, opa
Played two times: Wednesday independence day and on Sunday.
On Wednesday in KBI mixed doubles and singles: 2-6 TR96-2 (an vs rd-rt), 6-2 WUT (rt vs an-dd), 6-2 WUT (rd vs rt-dd), tie breaks vs rd: 6-10 WUT, 4-6 WUT, 6-4 TR96, strong doubles: 6-3 (ds vs rd-rs).
On Sunday played once with TR96-1 5-6 (hr vs kk-ms). Playing against kk is always tough.
Played tennis on Friday with newly strung TR96 L3 with s-gut at 48lbs. The sets were: 3-7 with T100-1 (Ar vs Ad-Fh), 5-7 with TR96 (Hn vs Ad-Dd), and 7-1 with TR96 (Ad vs Ar-Fh). TR96 played well controlled but slight wrist sore the next day.
Played tennis with TLC on Tuesday, 4 mini sets: 4-1 (... vs Joh-...), 3-4 (Joh vs Kk-Grd), 4-1 (Df vs Erc-Joh), 4-2 (Dn vs Ad-Df). All with TR96-2 new string felt good (control and spin). Hit out with CX16 but hard to control with old sgut.
Played mini soccer on Sunday, played once for 15 mins and lost 0-1.
